Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:05:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:04:59 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:59020 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:04:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:04:57 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Rik van Riel , Anton Altaparmakov , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020420160457.A12267@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To:

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:43:48PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Saturday 20 April 2002 20:13, you wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > As always, what I do is in the interest of Linux and freedom. > > > > Then why do you want to deny us the freedom to have a very > > useful piece of documentation in the kernel tree ? > > If I objected to the inclusion of a piece of code licensed under Microsoft's > 'shared source' license, whould you also say I was denying your freedom? You tried to -remove-, not include something. And, what you tried to remove was under the GPL license, not any other license. So your analogy doesn't hold. You attempted to remove a GPL'd work from a GPL'd work, on the basis of its content conflicting with your ideology. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/