Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:37:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:37:47 -0400 Received: from www.deepbluesolutions.co.uk ([212.18.232.186]:18700 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:37:47 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:37:39 +0100 From: Russell King To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Jeff Garzik , Anton Altaparmakov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020420233739.G8051@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To:

<20020420170747.B14186@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I went through the 1,000 or so most recent postings on lkml, looking for > patches that generated discussion. Here's what I found: Nice work. However, you forgot the other half of the job - finding out how many BK "patches" got merged into Linus' tree, and how many GNU patches. Only then can we make a real comparison. And yes, I've done Linus a favour - I've deleted him from the CC: list because he's said he's not interested in this discussion. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/