Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:43:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:43:30 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:22026 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:43:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3CC1EF05.6000702@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:43:17 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , Brian Gerst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jh@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSE related security hole In-Reply-To: <20020420201205.M1291@dualathlon.random> <20020420214114.A11894@wotan.suse.de> <20020420232818.N1291@dualathlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > As said in an earlier email it is a matter of memory bandwith, 59 bytes > of icache and zero data, against 7 bytes of icache and 512bytes of data. > the 512bytes of data are visibly slower, period. Saving mem bandwith is > much more important than reducing the number of instructions, even more > on SMP! > It's not 512 bytes of data -- only the part that's actually used is accessed. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/