Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:14:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:14:36 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:2200 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:14:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:14:34 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Skip Ford , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020420161434.B31306@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Skip Ford , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020420213446.ZCGU13286.out019.verizon.net@pool-141-150-235-204.delv.east.verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Skip Ford wrote: > > All of section 1 is an advertisement for using bk...including > > directions on how to setup your own clone. Those are _clearly_ > > bitkeeper directions and have nothing to do with how to submit > > patches. > > I'm sure Jeff would be more than happy to include an > advertisement for a free bitkeeper alternative, once > one exists. ;) And the sooner the better. I just read this entire thread and I'm disgusted. I've seen some lame threads in my day, but this takes the cake. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/