Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:10:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:10:30 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.120] ([195.223.140.120]:31250 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:10:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 04:09:42 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , Brian Gerst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jh@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSE related security hole Message-ID: <20020421040942.Q1291@dualathlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20020420201205.M1291@dualathlon.random> <20020420214114.A11894@wotan.suse.de> <20020420232818.N1291@dualathlon.random> <3CC1EF05.6000702@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:43:17PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > >As said in an earlier email it is a matter of memory bandwith, 59 bytes > >of icache and zero data, against 7 bytes of icache and 512bytes of data. > >the 512bytes of data are visibly slower, period. Saving mem bandwith is > >much more important than reducing the number of instructions, even more > >on SMP! > > > > It's not 512 bytes of data -- only the part that's actually used is > accessed. On current x86 yes (so far), but the x86-64 the whole 512bytes will have to be read from ram instead. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/