Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293132AbSDUCXN>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:23:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293276AbSDUCXM>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:23:12 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:31248 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293132AbSDUCXM>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:23:12 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:30:38 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, phillips@bonn-fries.net, torvalds@transmeta.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020421033038.4bd1b9ec.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020420170348.A14186@havoc.gtf.org>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit.
> > A link to the information is completely sufficient.
> 
> What was Daniel's action?  Remove the text.  Nothing else.  Sure, he
> suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them?  No.

Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/