Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310654AbSDUC3H>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:29:07 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310666AbSDUC3G>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:29:06 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:39952 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S310654AbSDUC3G>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:29:06 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:36:33 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, garzik@havoc.gtf.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020421033633.02245aa2.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <E16ybVt-0000UV-00@starship>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Daniel Phillips Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> A steady slide toward proprietary tools and behind-the-scenes development
>  in cathedral-style is an issue.

Whilst Im not sure I agree that bitkeeper is going to push things 'behind
the scenes' (its a source management tool, not the source itself), I do
think the basic point being made here has some merit. Think about it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/