Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289272AbSDUCi7>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:38:59 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S290593AbSDUCi6>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:38:58 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:56848 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289272AbSDUCi6>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:38:58 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:46:25 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com>
Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, torvalds@transmeta.com, aia21@cantab.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020421034625.09f41fa0.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020420223024.GB2994@come.alcove-fr>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Stelian Pop Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

>  Or maybe using a SCM puts more pressure on the developper which 
>  writes better code, which will get accepted with less discussion.

I dont buy that. Its well known that teams of programmers tend to write
WORSE code when they dont talk to each other.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/