Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293203AbSDUCuh>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:50:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293276AbSDUCug>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:50:36 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:28177 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293203AbSDUCuf>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:50:35 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:57:59 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@transmeta.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020421035759.19c4bf7b.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020420194851.A8051@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.

I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.

He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.

We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
different?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/