Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293131AbSDUDiy>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:38:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293276AbSDUDix>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:38:53 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:47380 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293131AbSDUDix>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:38:53 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 04:46:16 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, phillips@bonn-fries.net, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020421044616.5beae559.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020421025654.GE2296@conectiva.com.br>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

well, this raises an interesting point...

should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
not?

is this 'bitkeeper documentation', 'documentation about bitkeeper', or
'linux kernel documentation', or what?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/