Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:32:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:32:48 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:24582 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:32:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3CC240EB.AAD35A09@zip.com.au> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:32:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: viro@math.psu.edu, torvalds@transmeta.com, spyro@armlinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... In-Reply-To: <20020420.205958.123241031.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Alexander Viro > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:27 -0400 (EDT) > > FWIW, I doubt that dropping -pre completely in favour of dayly snapshots is > a good idea - "2.5.N-preM oopses when ..." is preferable to "snapshot YY/MM/DD > oopses when..." simply because it's easier to match bug reports that way. > Having all deltas downloadable as diff+comment is wonderful, but it doesn't > replace well-defined (and less frequent) resync points. > > Comments? > > I agree, make the daily's available but don't kill the -pre. Dailies (nice) would need some distinguishing feature in EXTRAVERSION, please. "-20Apr02" would suit. (I suspect if that started happening, the -pre's would become redundant. But that can be decided at a later stage) - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/