Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757576Ab0BXTCo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:02:44 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:39473 "EHLO mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757364Ab0BXTCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:02:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=EJOxLx6X3Wr82bDovXLe+55nwjPNeXYby8oRBlkFWG6Nu+I8XHd9pvVURKRobXMbiH wb76xcDUrOvJAPnhc/vNwtBEOuVTVZv+eJH1dWagwuO6sXu80T9+tcxaSSCLWYOxS4AX zZj5lLw/9z/toNAEvO/1kUCeX40TRg3ZSEfwY= Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:02:34 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Mark Brown Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] Regulators: wm8400 - cleanup platform driver data handling Message-ID: <20100224190234.GD25304@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20100224073342.15964.8863.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100224073849.15964.62321.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100224102548.GG18896@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100224102548.GG18896@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1248 Lines: 29 On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:25:49AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:38:50PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Driver data set by platform_set_drvdata() is for private use of > > the driver currently bound to teh device and not for use by parent, > > subsystem and anyone else. > > > > Also have wm8400_register_regulator() accept 'sturct wm8400 *' > > instead of generic device structure. > > Nack due to this change - this change would make it impossible for > callers to actually call the function. Note that nothing including only > wm8400.h even has a struct declaration, much less defniition, for struct > wm8400. If you notice I added forward declaration of "struct wm8400" to wm8400.h thus users can pass around pointer to the structure. I really think we should refrain from passing naked 'struct device *' pointers as much as possible since it is error prone. Otherwise wm8400_register_regulator has no way of ensuting that passed 'dev' is indeed wm8400. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/