Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:01:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:01:05 -0500 Received: from service.sh.cvut.cz ([147.32.127.214]:263 "EHLO service.sh.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:00:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:30:28 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Kacer To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25 In-Reply-To: <20001208190829.A17848@inspiron.random> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: # On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:02:57PM +0100, Martin Kacer wrote: # > Is there any chance to get rid of these VMM failures? # You should apply this patch on top of 2.2.18pre25: # ftp://.../VM-global-2.2.18pre25-7.bz2 Well, I've found that VM-global patch before, of course. Until now, the last version was against pre18. Since I do not know the exact rules for including new things into Alan's tree, I thought that VM-global patch was already included in pre24. Sorry for my lack of experience. ;-)) I should have checked it. As I wrote before, I had no time recently to follow the mailing list carefully and I didn't know exactly what VM-global patch is. # > It seems we need to return back to 2.2.13 for some time. :-( # Definitely no, you only need to apply the above collection of bugfixes. Ok, I can try it, at least. I will let you know about results. Martin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/