Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:30:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:30:38 -0400 Received: from mail.scram.de ([195.226.127.117]:64203 "EHLO mail.scram.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:30:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:28:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Jochen Friedrich X-X-Sender: jochen@alpha.bocc.de To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo cc: Ian Molton , Russell King , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree In-Reply-To: <20020421025654.GE2296@conectiva.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any > > different? > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers. So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390 mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home page... Developing kernel stuff on 390 without emulator can be much fun as host operators tend to get very pissed if the IPL ratio comes near to 1/min ;-) --jochen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/