Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758792Ab0BYBwu (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:52:50 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:40118 "EHLO mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758774Ab0BYBws (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:52:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hYI8RtjH5+pvHPw+786qtI7qMIYKexG5X++g8Onu9xbxRYKb9mKtYk4FIib6sfKeV+ dTxm52QatTW1u6Y2qVpJ0qAXTa6TFoZpo9sMoJdlNdap3lwrdIHnsViOGb10Qo4tN4mY B6ZIWqKOOVz05WL61JNhaWYJxSzLUoiJYH0Jw= Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:52:46 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Tom Zanussi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata Message-ID: <20100225015244.GC7491@nowhere> References: <1264580883-15324-1-git-send-email-tzanussi@gmail.com> <1264580883-15324-9-git-send-email-tzanussi@gmail.com> <20100223214445.GF5357@nowhere> <1266991243.6427.44.camel@tropicana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1266991243.6427.44.camel@tropicana> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1154 Lines: 30 On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still > work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the > nicer syscall names. > > When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those > patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal. Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so it's fine. Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet supported. I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well. Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy to modify as the callbacks are intuitive. I'm pushing that right away so happily... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/