Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:16:46 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/06] kernel.h hexdump cleanup
Message-Id: <20100224181646.bde9c183.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <a8e1da1002241752u637f7debi2ff46f50ac5edcd8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100222141934.GA9030@darkstar>
	<1266867811.10646.196.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	<a8e1da1002241752u637f7debi2ff46f50ac5edcd8@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1158
Lines: 29

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:52:49 +0800 Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:19 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >> hexdump stuff in kernel.h should be put into a standalone head file
> >
> > I think it'd be clearer to have logging functions
> > in kernel.h split into a separate header or grouped
> > a bit better in kernel.h.
> >
> > I would have kernel.h #include that header though
> > rather than splitting out things like hexdump functions
> > into a separate file requiring yet another #include in
> > source files.
> 
> Andrew, what do you think about this?

Well.  Avoiding bisection-bustage is hardly a priority any more, but
let's not break bisection this time if we can avoid it.

> Actually I hesitate to send this patch as well, too many recipients
> needed from get_maintainer.pl.

They'll live ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/