Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758918Ab0BYDj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:39:28 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1201 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758899Ab0BYDj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:39:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/06] kernel.h hexdump cleanup From: Joe Perches To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Young , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Li Zefan In-Reply-To: <20100224181646.bde9c183.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100222141934.GA9030@darkstar> <1266867811.10646.196.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100224181646.bde9c183.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:39:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1267069164.30508.7.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 23 On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Avoiding bisection-bustage is hardly a priority any more, but > let's not break bisection this time if we can avoid it. I think that kernel.h could use a lot more cleaning than this. Separating it into multiple pieces is OK, but moving stuff around to categorize it a bit better is also useful. I've tried both ways. Doing it all as one patchset / git commit would be best. Here's a link to the last time I tried as a 14 patch block http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67829/ http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/77 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/