Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753960Ab0BYGJ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:09:57 -0500 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:65429 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753326Ab0BYGJ4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:09:56 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=M3sIokCUTuDnUmFdNtadimyxc8Ua/E4i3GS27NZy3vy0BcYWH6ZwYcXhEdgDVe090Z sDvnppHZeHUSQnvEZPF/no7B2zYqaFCnOldRRAWL/0aHonDop4e7mSeOO8aKn5OiLuwB bC8EMivTX0DQT0QIaqR/nLBgb3g3Ym2SWnK+I= Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata From: Tom Zanussi To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com In-Reply-To: <20100225015244.GC7491@nowhere> References: <1264580883-15324-1-git-send-email-tzanussi@gmail.com> <1264580883-15324-9-git-send-email-tzanussi@gmail.com> <20100223214445.GF5357@nowhere> <1266991243.6427.44.camel@tropicana> <20100225015244.GC7491@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:09:53 -0600 Message-Id: <1267078193.6611.146.camel@tropicana> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1322 Lines: 36 On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:52 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still > > work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the > > nicer syscall names. > > > > When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those > > patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal. > > > Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still > go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so > it's fine. > > Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some > few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet > supported. > > I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well. > > Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate > a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy > to modify as the callbacks are intuitive. > > I'm pushing that right away so happily... > Great! Thanks for reviewing and pushing it all. Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/