Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:10:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:10:13 -0400 Received: from mole.bio.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.36.9]:3892 "EHLO mole.bio.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:10:12 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020421120820.040107b0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:10:05 +0100 To: Jochen Friedrich From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Cc: Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Phillips , In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 10:22 21/04/02, Jochen Friedrich wrote: >Hi Larry, > > > Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting > > a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits. > >Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and >reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this >environment. Not wrong. BK works fine over http protocol. CVS is another matter which I cannot comment on... Best regards, Anton -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/