Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:18:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:18:51 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:20753 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:18:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:18:34 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Phillips , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting > > a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits. > > Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and > reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this > environment. So you're telling me that what I've been doing over the last months really shouldn't have been possible ? Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/