Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:17:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:17:19 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:37534 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:17:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:17:17 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020421111717.A2301@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <20020420171714.A31656@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:22:10AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > Hi Larry, > > > Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting > > a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits. > > Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and > reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this > environment. Wrong -- both BK and CVS can be proxied. CVS takes a bit more effort. 'bk helptool url' gives you proxy info for BK. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/