Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:33:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:33:14 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:52382 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:33:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:33:12 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Ian Molton Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, phillips@bonn-fries.net, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020421113312.C2301@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <20020420115233.A617@havoc.gtf.org> <3CC19470.ACE2EFA1@linux-m68k.org> <20020420122541.B2093@havoc.gtf.org> <3CC1A31B.AC03136D@linux-m68k.org> <20020420170348.A14186@havoc.gtf.org> <20020421033038.4bd1b9ec.spyro@armlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:30:38AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit. > > > A link to the information is completely sufficient. > > > > What was Daniel's action? Remove the text. Nothing else. Sure, he > > suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them? No. > > Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that? It's really trivial to put a document up on a Web site, before submitting a patch to remove said document. Or to contact someone, and get them to post the doc. Did he even attempt to do that? No. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/