Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313403AbSDUPcG>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:32:06 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313413AbSDUPcF>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:32:05 -0400
Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:50078 "HELO gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S313403AbSDUPcF>;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:32:05 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:32:04 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020421113204.B2301@havoc.gtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020420170747.B14186@havoc.gtf.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204202032320.10850-100000@waste.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:38:26PM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > Which patches are the stealth patches?
> 
> The ones that say 'pull from here' are pretty opaque and seem to go past
> without much discussion. Off the top of my head, I'd say about
> I've seen about as many bk pushes as pulls but that could be perceptual
> bias.

The point has been made that those patches were sent to Linus without
CC'ing lkml, in the past.  Do you see any newly stealthed patches, which
were not opaque pre-BK?

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/