Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:36:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:36:56 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:59550 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:36:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:36:53 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Ian Molton Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, phillips@bonn-fries.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020421113653.E2301@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To:

<20020420194851.A8051@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20020421035759.19c4bf7b.spyro@armlinux.org> <20020421025654.GE2296@conectiva.com.br> <20020421044616.5beae559.spyro@armlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:46:16AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about > > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers. > > well, this raises an interesting point... > > should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or > not? No, it doesn't raise this point. Documentation is licensed either separately, or with the package containing it. As it is here. There is no "should it be regarded" questions. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/