Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933791Ab0BYVCz (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:02:55 -0500 Received: from edu-smtp-01.edutel.nl ([88.159.1.221]:42236 "EHLO edu-smtp-01.edutel.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933668Ab0BYVCy (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:02:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4B86E572.6090101@neli.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:02:42 +0100 From: Micha Nelissen User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20091109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bounine, Alexandre" CC: mporter@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.moll.ext@nsn.com, thomas.moll@sysgo.com, Alexandre Bounine Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] RapidIO: Add Port-Write handling for EM References: <20100224152401.GC13661@kaneng01.tundra.com> <4B85894A.6040406@neli.hopto.org> <0CE8B6BE3C4AD74AB97D9D29BD24E552A5508A@CORPEXCH1.na.ads.idt.com> In-Reply-To: <0CE8B6BE3C4AD74AB97D9D29BD24E552A5508A@CORPEXCH1.na.ads.idt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2619 Lines: 71 Bounine, Alexandre wrote: > Micha Nelissen wrote: >> Alexandre Bounine wrote: >>> /** >>> + * rio_em_set_ops- Sets Error Managment operations for a particular > vendor switch >>> + * @rdev: RIO device >>> + * >>> + * Searches the RIO EM ops table for known switch types. If the vid >>> + * and did match a switch table entry, then set the em_init() and >>> + * em_handle() ops to the table entry values. >> Shouldn't any RIO device be able to support error management, not just >> switches? > > Only if a device reports this capability by having Error Management > Extended Features block. > Ideally, we have to provide default handler for every such device (I am > planning it for some future updates). It should be the same as for > routing operations - if the standard feature exists, it has to be used > unless something else takes over. Yes, therefore I thought that: or the EM_OPS are per driver, or they can be integrated in the switch hooks list. > For now I keep all port-write messages from end-points serviced by their > individual drivers. One of reasons for this: the EM PW message format Maybe have a generic rio function that can be called by any driver that knows a particular port-write was due to error management causes? This function would read the standard defined EF block registers. Then the driver part can be quite small. >>> + if (port->ops->pwenable) >>> + port->ops->pwenable(port, enable); >>> +} >>> + >> Maybe this can be done by switch->init function? > > This is not per-switch function. This function enables mport to receive > incoming PW messages. Per-switch PW enable is done in switch->init as > for Tsi57x. Oops, I meant this comment for the em_init function call. >>> + rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, > hopcount, >>> + rdev->phys_efptr + >>> + RIO_PORT_N_ACK_STS_CSR(portnum), >>> + RIO_PORT_N_ACK_CLEAR); >> This doesn't work for the 568; but the 568 has no special handling? > > Tsi568 will not send EM PW message. Tsi568 PWs are disabled in its > em_init(). Why? >>> +DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI578, tsi57x_em_init, > tsi57x_em_handler); >> Why not declare these along with the other ops? > > Because the EM extensions is a separate capability. It is not guaranteed > to be in every switch. They might initialize them with NULL to indicate they don't support it? Micha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/