Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:45:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:45:35 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-105.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.105]:29075 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:45:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Jeff Garzik , Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:46:11 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3CC201F7.B3AC3FDF@linux-m68k.org> <20020421123257.A4479@havoc.gtf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:32, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:04:07AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Since Linus uses BK, and the document is there in the first place > to make life easier, Daniel is therefore making life more difficult > because of ideology, and no other reason. Yup, that's me. No, I don't always check my conscience at the door. If that were my habit I'd have spent the past three years comfortably programming big, expensive machines under Windows. N.B., not implying you're morally bankrupt, no suggestion of that at all. Still, since you just dumps on all those who prefer to follow their hearts, you deserve to be publically challenged. Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/