Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:00:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:00:25 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:63130 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:00:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:00:22 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020421100022.B10525@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Jochen Friedrich , Anton Altaparmakov , Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020421120820.040107b0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 06:46:07PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > >Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and > > >reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this > > >environment. > > > > Not wrong. BK works fine over http protocol. CVS is another matter which I > > cannot comment on... > > Ok, but there are other scenarios where only email is available (often via > mail gateways like softswitch on os/390)... BK works with email as its only transport and has for a long time. bk help send bk help receive -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/