Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:08:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:08:44 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-105.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.105]:47251 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:08:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:09:25 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020421035759.19c4bf7b.spyro@armlinux.org> <20020421113536.D2301@havoc.gtf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 April 2002 17:35, you wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:57:59AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > > Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > > > But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's > > > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club. > > > > I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall. > > Sure he did. Would you please show me where? At most you'll find a warning we should be vigilant, that we should be thinking about how to improve the level of discussion of important patches. Private patch streams containing important work have always tended to dissipate the essential strength of the community, in my opinion. Bitkeeper just makes it easier. That is far from suggesting Linux is teetering on the brink. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/