Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935453Ab0BZHnF (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:43:05 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1209 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935419Ab0BZHnD (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:43:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/07] kernel.h string cleanup From: Joe Perches To: Dave Young Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20100225155359.GA2722@darkstar> <20100225185515.GB3305@core2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:42:59 -0800 Message-ID: <1267170179.12041.4.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 581 Lines: 16 On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:33 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > It will be better to move some of them to proper place instead of kernel.h Perhaps you could describe some of the reasons why it's better to move them. Maybe you could post the results of a timed compile comparison with kernel.h broken into multiple pieces while you're at it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/