Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313622AbSDURQB>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:16:01 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313630AbSDURQA>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:16:00 -0400
Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:17570 "HELO gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S313622AbSDURP7>;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:15:59 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:15:58 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Kenneth Johansson <ken@kenjo.org>, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020421131558.D4479@havoc.gtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204201039130.19512-100000@home.transmeta.com> <E16ygRk-0000bR-00@starship> <3CC1F6AB.16C5E6D3@kenjo.org> <E16yyIu-0000kf-00@starship>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Good point.  Perhaps we extend this idea to: A patch goes into the tree that
> really should have been discussed but wasn't, now we know who to beat up.
> Err, like the BK documentation patch.

I of course question that said patch needed to be discussed beyond the
discussion that already occurred (admittedly in private)

But yep.  You know who to beat up about these things :)

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/