Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934725Ab0BZLSf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:18:35 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36511 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934332Ab0BZLSc (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:18:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:18:23 +1100 From: Nick Piggin To: Christian Ehrhardt Cc: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , epasch@de.ibm.com, SCHILLIG@de.ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com, thoss@de.ibm.com, hare@suse.de, gregkh@novell.com Subject: Re: Performance regression in scsi sequential throughput (iozone) due to "e084b - page-allocator: preserve PFN ordering when __GFP_COLD is set" Message-ID: <20100226111823.GI9738@laptop> References: <4B796C6D.80800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100216112517.GE1194@csn.ul.ie> <4B7ACC1E.9080205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B7BBCFC.4090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100218114310.GC32626@csn.ul.ie> <4B7D664C.20507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B7E73BF.5030901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100219151934.GA1445@csn.ul.ie> <4B82A603.9030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B8693B0.7000804@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8693B0.7000804@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1121 Lines: 31 On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > FIN) > So, thats it from my side. > I look forward to the finalized congestion_wait->zone wait patch however > this turns out (zone wait is resonable if fixing this symptom or not in > my opinion). > But still I have a small amount of hope left that all the data I found here > might give someone the kick to see whats going on in mm's backstage due to > that patches. Hi Christian, Thanks for doing all this work. I've been looking at a couple of other regressions while it seemed like you guys were making progress. I can't seem to reproduce it on my x86-64 system (was anybody able to reproduce it on x86?) Anyway I have asked our mainframe guy whether we can set up an environment. I agree it is a real problem that really needs to be properly explained. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/