Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:05:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:05:45 -0500 Received: from smtp-fwd.valinux.com ([198.186.202.196]:1287 "EHLO mail.valinux.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:05:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:34:51 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Vojkovich To: David Woodhouse cc: Andi Kleen , Rainer Mager , Subject: Re: Signal 11 In-Reply-To: <25692.976268767@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > ak@suse.de said: > > Sounds like a X Server bug. You should probably contact XFree86, not > > linux-kernel > > I quote from the X devel list, which perhaps I shouldn't do but this is hardly > NDA'd stuff: > > On Mon 20 Nov 2000, mvojkovich@valinux.com said: > > I have seen random crashes on dual P3 BX boards (Tyan) and dual Xeon > > GX boards (Intel). XFree86 core dumps indicate that it happens in > > random places, in old as dirt software rendering code that has nothing > > wrong with it. I've only seen this under 2.3.x/2.4 SMP kernels. I > > would say that this is definitely a kernel problem. > > XFree86 3.9 and XFree86 4 were rock solid for a _long_ time on 2.[34] > kernels - even on my BP6?. The random crashes started to happen when I > upgraded my distribution? - and are only seen by people using 2.4. So I > suspect that it's the combination of glibc and kernel which is triggering > it. Some additional data points. It goes away on UP 2.4 kernels. Also, I can't recall seeing this problem on IA64. Maybe it's still there on IA64 and I just haven't been trying hard enough to crash it, but my current impression is that the problem doesn't exist on IA64. Hmmm... IA64 is a static server. I don't hear of people having problems on 3.3.6 servers either. I'm wondering if a non-loader 4.0 server would have problems on IA32 with a 2.4 kernel. That's something for people to try. Mark. > > -- > dwmw2 > > ? And the BP6 still falls over less frequently than the dual P3 I use at > work. > ? RH7. Don't start. > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/