Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313657AbSDURku>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:40:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313658AbSDURku>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:40:50 -0400
Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:16027 "EHLO bitmover.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S313657AbSDURks>;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:40:48 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:40:46 -0700
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020421104046.J10525@work.bitmover.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>, CaT <cat@zip.com.au>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204201039130.19512-100000@home.transmeta.com> <E16yfW9-0000aZ-00@starship> <20020421171629.GK4640@zip.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was
> > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply
> > > because there is a real point to it.
> > 
> > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway.  The part that's
> > missing is the discussion.  Just looking at the recent traffic... there's
> 
> Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big
> and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If
> this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not
> get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with

I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the
lk list when it gets new work.  Linus?
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/