Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313688AbSDUSPs>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:15:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313666AbSDUSPr>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:15:47 -0400
Received: from dsl-213-023-040-105.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.105]:43156 "EHLO
	starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S313722AbSDUSPR>;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:15:17 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:15:53 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
Cc: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20020421101731.D10525@work.bitmover.com> <E16yyya-0000l7-00@starship> <20020421110826.N10525@work.bitmover.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <E16yzOr-0000lT-00@starship>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Plus, the url saves download
> > bandwidth.  A compelling argument I'd say.
> 
> The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked.  If you care about
> bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth
> compared to diff and patch.

All you said is 'it doesn't waste *that* much bandwidth'.  Remember, this is
the place we spend days arguing over a cycle or two.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/