Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313706AbSDUSSq>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:18:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313666AbSDUSRQ>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:17:16 -0400
Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:38414 "HELO
	netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S313706AbSDUSQX>;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:16:23 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:15:50 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: John Alvord <jalvo@mbay.net>
Cc: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>, Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>,
        Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, phillips@bonn-fries.net,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@transmeta.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020421181550.GF4571@conectiva.com.br>
Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>,
	John Alvord <jalvo@mbay.net>, Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>,
	Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	phillips@bonn-fries.net, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204211123590.18496-100000@alpha.bocc.de> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0204211110450.22439-100000@otter.mbay.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:11:52AM -0700, John Alvord escreveu:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > > > different?
> > > 
> > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> > > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
> > 
> > So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet 
> > another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390 
> > mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home 
> > page...
> <Puzzled> I thought hercules was an open source project... There are some
> prioriatery 390 emulators (UMX, Flex) but not hercules.

As I said, its QPLed, so non-proprietary but subject to flamefest, but lets
stick (not me, thanks) to the regular bk ones ;)

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/