Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:46:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:46:05 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-105.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.105]:63892 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:46:05 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:46:40 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Larry McVoy , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020421101731.D10525@work.bitmover.com> <20020421113612.W10525@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:36, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites: > > > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long > > > > > since forgotten the password to my old helsinki.fi account ;), > > > > > > > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered. > > > > > > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer > > > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated > > > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do > > > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim. > > > > So the offer was not in good faith. > > Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through > the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged > on, and refuse to substantiate? Larry, you just lathered on a bunch of new conditions of dubious merit. I understand by this that you had no real intention of following through on your offer because you thought that it would never get close to becoming reality. > We can discuss the good-faith issue *after* you answer the questions. Riiiiight. I have at least forwarded your demands to those who have expressed their positions to me privately. If you think I'm going to violate their confidence on your whim, you can think again. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/