Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:14:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:14:12 -0400 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:5262 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:14:10 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:54:07 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Doug Ledford , Andrea Arcangeli , jh@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com, aj@suse.de, ak@suse.de, pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: SSE related security hole Message-ID: <20020421195407.GB12120@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020418072615.I14322@dualathlon.random> <20020418094444.A2450@redhat.com> <20020418192003.GE11220@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020418153238.A25037@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > It introduces security hole: Unrelated tasks now have your top secret > > value you stored in one of your registers. > > Well, that's been my point all along and why I sent the patch. I was not > asking why leaving the registers alone instead of 0ing them out was not a > security hole. I was asking why doing so was not backward compatible? Introducing security hole counts as "poor backcompatibility" to me. Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/