Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936160Ab0B0Van (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:30:43 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:44444 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935453Ab0B0Vak (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:30:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:30:39 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz To: Neil Brown cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz Subject: Re: mdadm software raid + ext4, capped at ~350MiB/s limitation/bug? In-Reply-To: <20100228080100.092c24c2@notabene.brown> Message-ID: References: <20100228080100.092c24c2@notabene.brown> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2424 Lines: 75 On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Neil Brown wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:47:48 -0500 (EST) > Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have two separate systems and with ext4 I cannot get speeds greater than >> ~350MiB/s when using ext4 as the filesystem on top of a raid5 or raid0. >> It appears to be a bug with ext4 (or its just that ext4 is slower for this >> test)? >> >> Each system runs 2.6.33 x86_64. > > Could be related to the recent implementation of IO barriers in md. > Can you try mounting your filesystem with > -o barrier=0 > > and see how that changes the result. > > NeilBrown Hi Neil, Thanks for the suggestion, it has been used here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/27/66 Looks like an EXT4 issue as XFS does ~600MiB/s..? Its strange though, on a single hard disk, I get approximately the same speed for XFS and EXT4, but when it comes to scaling across multiple disks, in RAID-0 or RAID-5 (tested), there is a performance problem as it hits a performance problem at ~350MiB/s. I tried multiple chunk sizes but nothing seemed to made a difference (whether 64KiB or 1024KiB), XFS performs at 500-600MiB/s no matter what and EXT4 does not exceed ~350MiB/s. Is there anyone on any of the lists that gets > 350MiB/s on a mdadm/sw raid with EXT4? A single raw disk, no partitions: p63:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdm bs=1M count=10240 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 92.4249 s, 116 MB/s A single raw disk formatted with XFS, no partitions: p63:~# mkfs.xfs /dev/sdm > /dev/null 2>&1 p63:~# mount /dev/sdm -o nobarrier,noatime /r1 p63:/r1# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1M count=10240 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 85.7782 s, 125 MB/s A single raw disk formatted with EXT4, no partitions: p63:~# mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdm > /dev/null 2>&1 p63:~# mount /dev/sdm -o nobarrier,noatime /r1 p63:/r1# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1M count=10240 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 85.1501 s, 126 MB/s p63:/r1# EXT2 vs. EXT3 vs. EXT4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/27/77 XFS tests: (550-600MiB/s) http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-02/msg10572.html Justin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/