Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031468Ab0B1HYT (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:24:19 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:46270 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031444Ab0B1HYS (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:24:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:23:57 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, roland@redhat.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hjl.tools@gmail.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Subject: Re: linux-next requirements Message-ID: <20100228072357.GB14205@elte.hu> References: <20100211195614.886724710@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <201002271323.14402.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100227124710.GA21164@elte.hu> <201002272007.43042.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002272007.43042.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1625 Lines: 44 * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > In fact those rare ways of building and booting the kernel i mentioned are > > probably used _more_ than half of the architectures that linux-next > > build-tests ... > > I don't know and you don't know either. That's just pure speculation and > therefore meaningless. We know various arch (and hardware) usage stats, such as: http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html Today's stats, done amongst users who are willing to opt in to the Smolt daemon: x86: 99.7% powerpc: 0.3% x86 used to be 99.5 a year ago, so the world has become even more x86-centric. There's also the kerneloops.org client, which shows in excess of 95% x86 usage as well. You can also grep the linux-kernel folder for arch signatures, etc. And yes, there are millions of ARM (and MIPS) CPUs running Linux as well. (They are only as present as present their developers are: the users almost never show up on linux-kernel.) Plus, a kernel subsystem maintainer like me who does lots of kernel infrastructure work can have a pretty good gut feeling about which architectures are actively helping out Linux, and which are just hanging on to the bandwagon. So i respectfully disagree with your 'pure speculation' bit. Yes, it's somewhat of a guessing game, as so many things in life - but the trend is very clear. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/