Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313947AbSDUX26>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:28:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313962AbSDUX25>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:28:57 -0400
Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14]:61003 "EHLO
	server0011.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S313947AbSDUX24>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:28:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:36:20 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, zippel@linux-m68k.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-Id: <20020422003620.6dea3db6.spyro@armlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020421115904.G2301@havoc.gtf.org>
Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org
Organization: The dragon roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4cvs5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

>  If Linus had applied your patch, there would be a lag time during which
>  the doc would have no home at all.

He merely provided the patch. he didnt try to force it through in a hurry,
which left plenty of time for relocation in the meantime.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/