Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:05:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:05:21 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:33946 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:05:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Russell King , Skip Ford Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:05:27 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020421044616.5beae559.spyro@armlinux.org> <20020421043811.BHIC5495.out020.verizon.net@pool-141-150-235-204.delv.east.verizon.net> <20020421093103.A19904@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 April 2002 10:31, Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:40:11AM -0400, Skip Ford wrote: > > That's only 1 aspect. The frustrating part is bug reports mailed to the > > list getting a response of "oh, that's fixed in the latest bk tree." > > > > That's happened a dozen times in the last week...no wonder non-bk users > > feel out of the loop. I've been staring at the code for a lot of years > > and it's finally just starting to make sense to me, now by the time I see > > it the core hackers have moved on to something else. > > > > Daily snapshots would be great. > > We have hourly snapshots, thanks to the work David Woodhouse and > Rik van Riel did at a moments notice. Does this satisfy your > concerns above? Interesting. How does that work, exactly? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/