Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:44:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:44:22 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:23206 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:44:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:44:21 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Message-ID: <20020422084421.A17613@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Daniel Phillips , Linus Torvalds , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:53:13PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I hope I made it clear that I believe BK is helping Linux. Furthermore, I > don't see why Larry should not collect some advertising for his contribution. > Within limits. IMHO, we're on the wrong side of the limit at the moment, > and moving further with no sign of moderating. Yes, because so many purchasing managers spend their time reading the Documentation subdirectory of the Linux kernel in order to decide what SCM system they should use. The existence (or non-existence) of the docs has absolutely no marketing value to BK. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/