Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:50:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:49:59 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:22940 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:49:58 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:50:25 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422084421.A17613@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 17:44, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:53:13PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > I hope I made it clear that I believe BK is helping Linux. Furthermore, I > > don't see why Larry should not collect some advertising for his contribution. > > Within limits. IMHO, we're on the wrong side of the limit at the moment, > > and moving further with no sign of moderating. > > Yes, because so many purchasing managers spend their time reading the > Documentation subdirectory of the Linux kernel in order to decide what > SCM system they should use. > > The existence (or non-existence) of the docs has absolutely no marketing > value to BK. So you have no problem with moving them to a website, leaving a url in SubmittingPatches? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/