Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:30:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:30:15 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:9895 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:30:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:30:13 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Jeff Garzik , dean gaudet , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Message-ID: <20020422103013.F17613@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Daniel Phillips , Jeff Garzik , dean gaudet , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422130328.C6638@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:27:37PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Is there *anybody* > here who'd have further license-related complaints about Bitkeeper if that > were done? (Speak or forever hold your peace.) Oh boy oh boy oh boy, if you can deliver a commitment that this is the last time we have a BK license-related complaint from a kernel hacker, I'll be the first to argue vehemently for that patch you want. I'd like to know how you are going to deliver on that offer you just made. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/