Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:46:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:46:30 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:33949 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:46:28 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:47:00 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Jeff Garzik , dean gaudet , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422103013.F17613@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 19:30, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:27:37PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Is there *anybody* > > here who'd have further license-related complaints about Bitkeeper if that > > were done? (Speak or forever hold your peace.) > > Oh boy oh boy oh boy, if you can deliver a commitment that this is the > last time we have a BK license-related complaint from a kernel hacker, > I'll be the first to argue vehemently for that patch you want. > > I'd like to know how you are going to deliver on that offer you just made. Clearly I'm not going to shut anyone up. However, only somebody with a very limited perception of the situation could fail to note that you're being tested, and what you do next is going to help form attitudes for some time to come. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/