Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:02:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:02:44 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:45725 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:02:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:03:05 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Larry McVoy , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422104857.I17613@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 19:48, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > Do you have a problem with moving other docs out to Websites, which are > > > > > describing closed-spec hardware? Such hardware (and their vendors) are > > > > > actively anti-open source, yet we have documents describing those, too. > > > > As far as I can see: question about moving the jfs CVS docs out of the tree > > as well, answered fully and, imho, correctly by me. > > What part of "describing closed-spec hardware" did you not understand? There is no kernel driver for Bitkeeper. What's your point? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/