Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:41:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:41:00 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:56582 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:41:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3CC4673B.21CD6090@linux-m68k.org> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:40:43 +0200 From: Roman Zippel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thunder from the hill CC: Daniel Phillips , lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thunder from the hill wrote: > --- bk-kernel-howto.txt~ Mon Apr 22 12:26:50 2002 > +++ bk-kernel-howto.txt Mon Apr 22 12:26:11 2002 > @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ I'd prefer this to be a separate document (e.g. README) and not somewhere inbetween. > + Also, BitKeeper is not free software. You may use it for free, subject > + to the licensing rules (bk help bkl will display them), but it is ^^^^^^^^^^^ At that point it's already too late, the user must have the chance to read this, before he installs bk. > + not open source. If you feel strongly about 100% free software > + tool chain, then don't use BitKeeper. Linus has repeatedly stated ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That has a "for all these idiots, that don't want to understand" aftertaste, I'm certain Linus doesn't want to imply that. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/