Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:43:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:43:53 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:50185 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:43:52 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: CONFIG_RAMFS in 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 ??? Date: 22 Apr 2002 12:43:41 -0700 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3CC1A1EF.AF524412@kegel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <3CC1A1EF.AF524412@kegel.com> By author: Dan Kegel In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Roy wrote: > > After upgrading to 2.4.19-pre7-ac2, I can't get CONFIG_RAMFS > > Gee, I hope CONFIG_RAMFS isn't going away. I need it to > do loopback mounts of cramfs on an embedded system that > uses tmpfs as its main filesystem. (tmpfs doesn't support > loopback mounts.) > CONFIG_RAMFS is probably going away, but that doesn't mean ramfs is going away. At least in Linux 2.5 ramfs will end up being required core code. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/