Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752747Ab0DFN6w (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:58:52 -0400 Received: from exhub016-4.exch016.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.225]:10110 "EHLO EXHUB016-4.exch016.msoutlookonline.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296Ab0DFN6p (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:58:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4BBB3E0F.1030309@cfl.rr.com> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:58:39 -0400 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karel Zak CC: Linux-kernel Subject: Re: Extended partition mapping wrong size References: <4BB0D12B.6060701@cfl.rr.com> <20100406114706.GA30340@nb.net.home> In-Reply-To: <20100406114706.GA30340@nb.net.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1729 Lines: 36 On 4/6/2010 7:47 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > This is probably kernel bug. It's really insane that the extended > pseudo partition overflows to the next logical partition. Indeed. > Please no. I think the size should not be more than 2 sectors (1024 > bytes). The current concept works for years and we have in userspace > /etc/partitions parsers that use "if (blocks <= 1)" to detect > extended partitions. Could you elaborate a bit on this? What programs have such tests and what would they do differently if it were larger? > The other problem are mkfs programs, the space used for alignment > could be 1MiB (or more) -- it's enough many mkfs programs. What's wrong with that? If you REALLY want to, there's no reason you can't create a tiny fs there. Then again, I could swear that once upon a time the kernel simply did not bother creating a dev node for the extended partition, and this seems to be a hack that was put in to make it easy for LILO to install to one. Personally I'd prefer going back to the old behavior of just not having a useless device there. > BTW, Linux does not use this policy for the others nested partition > tables (e.g. Solaris, BSD, Minix, ...). The extended dos partition > table is exception. The primary partitions for the others nested PT > are exported to the system with its real size :-) Indeed, also the hidden space in the logical partitions is also not exposed, otherwise you would have two dev nodes per logical partition. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/