Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754857Ab0DFOjt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:39:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43823 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951Ab0DFOjn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:39:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4BBB475A.7070002@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:38:18 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KOSAKI Motohiro CC: Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lee Schermerhorn , Minchan Kim , Nick Piggin , Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux 2.6.34-rc3) References: <20100402175937.GA19690@liondog.tnic> <20100406173754.7E5A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100406173754.7E5A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 35 On 04/06/2010 04:53 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Today, I've reviewed this patch carefully. but I haven't found any bug. > Also, I've runned stress workload with shrink_all_memory() today. but > I couldn't reproduce the issue. hmm.. (perhaps I'm no lucky guy. > I'm frequently fail to reproduce) > > I'll continue to work. My status with this bug is the same - I have gone through the code from all angles, but have not found any other bugs yet (except for that leak - which could leave invalid pointers behind). This makes me wonder if perhaps the bug is a side effect of something Borislav (and the other reproducers) have in their kernel configuration, which we do not have. Another (unlikely) thing is that the fix for the leak makes the bug go away. Yes, very unlikely. Borislav, could you please send us your .config ? Also, if you have the time, could you try out the patch (-v2) I mailed in a little up this thread that fixes the memory leak in anon_vma_fork? I suspect it should not change anything, but it could be useful to rule out anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/